[Cabal] AOL

Sean Egan seanegan at gmail.com
Thu Dec 21 00:46:20 EST 2006

On 12/20/06, Kevin M Stange <kevin at simguy.net> wrote:
> This seems to assert that any new code will have to be namespaced as
> pidgin_* or purple_* (or technically anything that isn't gaim_*).  Is
> that correct?  If so, will we be re-namespacing the entire codebase
> before 2.0.0 goes final?  If we keep the gaim_* namespacing but are no
> longer allowed to use it for new code, my concern is that we'd end up
> with versions such as 2.1.0 that contain a mix of the two different sets
> of namespaces.

Follow the threads, man!

This actually says the opposite; we're explicitly permitted to use
"Gaim" in our APIs. We have decided, however, that we would prefer to
change them and keep a compatibility header defining old names to new.


More information about the Cabal mailing list