[Cabal] [Gaim-commits] A quick poll about Gaim mailing list

Ethan Blanton elb at psg.com
Fri Feb 2 14:24:20 EST 2007

Mark Doliner spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > Yes, these are all subparts of our overall project, but it seems
> > misleading to say pidgin-commits when some will be on the list 
> > because of interest in only a subpart.
> We could always create separate mailing lists for libpurple, pidgin
> and gaim-text.

How could we logically do this?  They're part of the same project.
They're in the same branch in the repository.  They are tightly
coupled, with changes in libpurple often implying changes in pidgin
and gaim-text.  I just don't see the logic here.  Again, this is
something that people should filter locally, based on the files
touched in a commit, etc., if necessary.


The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
		-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cabal/attachments/20070202/46a51044/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Cabal mailing list