[Cabal] Copyright assignment

[Evan Schoenberg]

On Jan 16, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Sean Egan wrote:

> I'll definitely be asking the lawyers more about this, but I wanted to
> gauge your opinions first. Is requiring copyright assignment something
> you guys are in favor for? Dead against? Somewhere in the middle?

Would this be a requirement or a strongly worded recommendation? I  
ask because I'm concerned about the implication of such a requirement  
on code brought in from another source (e.g. a utility function or  
algorithm from another GPL project).

-Evan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cabal/attachments/20070116/1d4f8b5c/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cabal/attachments/20070116/1d4f8b5c/attachment.pgp