[Cabal] beta6 ready to go
mark at kingant.net
Fri Jan 19 11:48:08 EST 2007
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:49:03 -0500, Ethan Blanton wrote
> > * Having to maintain two revision control systems (mtn and svn)
> We shouldn't have to do this. There are just a few more branches and
> things to be moved over to monotone, after which we can tar the svn
> history up someplace and consult it only if someone things they have
> found a problem.
Are we not going to run a read-only Subversion server and sync it with
Monotone? If not, this complaint becomes, "Forcing potential developers to
learn a new version control system," which increases the barrier to entry.
The other option is to have people create patches from the most recent
release, and while that may work fine in most cases, it is not as good as
having people make patches from trunk.
More information about the Cabal