Prefix to subject line (Tim Huetz)

[Step]

Sorry, no intention to start any sort of jihad.  Just providing the link
since someone asked about it.

You know, though, I have to say I'm really sick of getting SHIT on every
time I do anything to try and help.  Obviously I'm not good enough, that's
been made quite clear, and my clumsy attempts at getting involved are not
only not appreciated, but down-right insulting to you superior beings.

/me leaves

On 4/21/07, Colin Barrett <timber at lava.net> wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Step wrote:
>
> > http://www.l33tskillz.org/writing/tagging-harmful/
> >
> > Subject line munging is explained well and advised against in this
> > article.  I'll copy the summary in for the lazy, in spite of that
> > being one of the points.  ;)
> >
> >
> > Some list administrators may not care much one way or the other about
> > Subject header tagging, but simply haven't bothered to turn off the
> > feature on their lists.  Other list administrators actively want to
> > have their lists perform Subject header tagging, because they believe
> > it provides a benefit for their subscribers.  But it doesn't:
>
> We had this discussion once already, PLEASE can we not have it again?
>
> Seriously, spare me another jihad. As I said before, I like the tags,
> but if the list admin doesn't want them, I can add them back in myself
> no problem. It's not a big deal either way.
>
> -Colin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070421/ad8edfb7/attachment.html>