Prefix to subject line (Tim Huetz)
random4444 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 21 22:13:13 EDT 2007
Sorry, no intention to start any sort of jihad. Just providing the link
since someone asked about it.
You know, though, I have to say I'm really sick of getting SHIT on every
time I do anything to try and help. Obviously I'm not good enough, that's
been made quite clear, and my clumsy attempts at getting involved are not
only not appreciated, but down-right insulting to you superior beings.
On 4/21/07, Colin Barrett <timber at lava.net> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Step wrote:
> > http://www.l33tskillz.org/writing/tagging-harmful/
> > Subject line munging is explained well and advised against in this
> > article. I'll copy the summary in for the lazy, in spite of that
> > being one of the points. ;)
> > Some list administrators may not care much one way or the other about
> > Subject header tagging, but simply haven't bothered to turn off the
> > feature on their lists. Other list administrators actively want to
> > have their lists perform Subject header tagging, because they believe
> > it provides a benefit for their subscribers. But it doesn't:
> We had this discussion once already, PLEASE can we not have it again?
> Seriously, spare me another jihad. As I said before, I like the tags,
> but if the list admin doesn't want them, I can add them back in myself
> no problem. It's not a big deal either way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Devel