Use case for per-protocol icons
Steven Garrity
stevelist at silverorange.com
Fri Aug 3 16:28:17 EDT 2007
H. Bons wrote:
> Like Steven said, that's more of a case of indicating a
> secure connection. I did a Secure emblem for 2.0, isn't
> that one used in the buddy list? (it's a yellow chain
> lock)
I don't see any indication of encryption on my jabber accounts (that use
TLS). That said, I don't think this belongs in the buddy list. It would
belong in the chat window, if anywhere.
Cheers,
Steven Garrity
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:02:53 -0400
> "Darrell Michaud" <DMichaud at pragmatech.com> wrote:
>> Thank you for the response, I'll give it a try and see
>> how it goes.
>>
>> -D
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Etan Reisner [mailto:pidgin at unreliablesource.net]
>> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:15 PM
>> To: Darrell Michaud
>> Cc: devel at pidgin.im
>> Subject: Re: Use case for per-protocol icons
>>
>> First off I want to thank you for actually reading that
>> ticket and
>> further
>> for taking the time to actually, constructively compose
>> an email
>> (without
>> yelling about this issue).
>>
>> All that being said, I believe both of those cases have
>> been brought up
>> in
>> the past and as stated before the time when you need to
>> know if your
>> communications will be secure is when you are in a
>> conversation and thus
>> in the conversation window, and generally not in the
>> buddy list, hence
>> having that information in the buddy list is largely
>> extraneous, not to
>> mention that the protocol icon just happened to provide
>> you with the
>> relevant information and wasn't actually conveying that
>> information (for
>> example some XMPP servers are encrypted c<->s and some
>> are not).
>>
>> And as to the icons being cute, you are free to choose
>> any single icon
>> you
>> want for the buddy list currently, you are not forced to
>> use the green
>> circle. And while you might have found it aesthetically
>> pleasing to see
>> multiple different icons all meaning 'available' many
>> many people did
>> not.
>>
>> -Etan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at pidgin.im
>> http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at pidgin.im
> http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the Devel
mailing list