Proposal for an extended callbacks field

[Andreas Monitzer]

On Jul 25, 2007, at 16:15, Etan Reisner wrote:

> What exactly is the snag that has been hit? Does it somehow require  
> adding
> more than four prpl callbacks?

I wasn't allowed to add a single one, out of the fear of running out  
of them.
So it doesn't matter if there are four or zero of them right there  
(except that one could be used for this idea).

andy