Proposal for an extended callbacks field

[Ethan Blanton]

Sean Egan spake unto us the following wisdom:
> On 7/25/07, Ethan Blanton <elb at pidgin.im> wrote:
> > I'm not sure that a) this is a real problem, or that b) we should
> > worry about it.  If we need a 3.0, we need a 3.0.
> 
> I would prefer to need a 3.0.0 because we need to remove something
> than needing a 3.0.0 because we want to add something. Re-doing
> privacy? 3.0.0. GObjectifying everything? 3.0.0. Unregistering an
> account? 2.n+1.0

Of course -- use one of the reserved fields.

Ethan

-- 
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
		-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070725/ae5c1c8a/attachment.sig>