Time for a break...

[Richard Laager]

On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:45 -0400, John Bailey wrote:
> My feeling on the matter is that if Gary finds that it is too difficult to
> implement his forward-thinking ideas or finds too much resistance when trying to
> do things properly instead of half-assed,

In my experience, we've always been very much about doing things
properly instead of half-assed. Forward-thinking might be more
questionable, but aside from a strong desire for backwards-compatibility
to the beginning of time (which I don't really understand), I think
we're okay there.

I wasn't around for the GObjectification conversation, but I think we
have a consensus that it's the right way to go and that we want to do
things the right way. Unless a lot of people have done a 180 recently, I
don't know what the problem is. I'm not saying it's the case at all, but
even if any one person were against this, that's not a reason to stop,
if everyone else believes it's the Right Way.

Richard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070521/312a521d/attachment.sig>