Compiling libpurple in Visual Studio

[Nick Hebner]

I have mtn pull'd and up'd (I'm new to mtn, but that should do it right?),
but there do not seem any differences. You are right about dbus, I am now
just including dbus-maybe.h, and not compiling the rest. If the xmlnode
struct init syntax has been fixed, then there are just a hand full of others
that should take care of it (cleaned up patches attached). Do you think it
would be a good idea to add a VS solution to the distribution?

Nick

On 5/28/07, Richard Laager <rlaager at wiktel.com> wrote:
>
> I take it you were working with 2.0.0? Could you try with 2.0.1 or MTN?
> I've fixed the xmlnode C99 struct initialization syntax, which was
> apparently a problem for you?
>
> With regard to DBus... Do you think it'd be better to simply avoid
> compiling those files at all, instead of #ifdefing out the contents?
>
> Richard
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070528/dc85190b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libpurple.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5046 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070528/dc85190b/attachment-0004.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libpurple.win32.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1960 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070528/dc85190b/attachment-0005.obj>