what is the child process fork by init_libpurple in nullclient.c?
sirtoozee
sirtoozee at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 08:15:46 EDT 2007
Hi geek,
I noticed that there are some child process showing in my konsole like below:
root 4818 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4819 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4820 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4821 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4822 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4823 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4824 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4825 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4826 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4827 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4828 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4833 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4843 4811 0 19:46 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
root 4854 4811 0 19:48 pts/1 00:00:00 [libpurple] <defunct>
when nullclient.c called the init_libpurple(), I just want to know
what, why and how created them.
And a guy, a pidgin fans in China.P.R, paid some attention to the
source code said it handled the DNS stuff. Really?
What`s more, the nullclient.c often show the ASSERT info just like
shown as below:
** (process:4811): CRITICAL **: x509_tls_peers_init: assertion `ret == 0' failed
How to fix it, thanks a lot ^_^
sirtoozee
--
An individual human existence should be like a river - small at first,
narrowly contained within its banks, and rushing passionately past
boulders and over waterfalls. Gradually the river grows wider, the
banks recede, the waters flow more quietly, and in the end, without
any visible break, they become merged in the sea, and painlessly lose
their individual being.
More information about the Devel
mailing list