Bounty for voice/video support in Pidgin

Richard Laager rlaager at
Tue Aug 5 15:33:08 EDT 2008

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 14:55 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> To me, it seems that voice is more important than video, because people
> who want to use webcams would generally expect that the audio work at
> the same time. At the same time, if implementing video implies audio,
> then you'd be able to claim both at once (or audio first) anyway.

I've created the start of subprojects. You can find them on the parent
project page here:

The voice projects are subprojects of the video projects, because video
implies audio support as well. (Who wants video without sound?)

Please, by all means, if you are interested in this, propose
improvements to the requirements. Then I can start allocating money from
the parent project to the subprojects.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the Devel mailing list