Fixing (Encryption + AIM Direct IM)

[Evan Schoenberg]

On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:31 -0500, Evan Schoenberg wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
>>> wouldn't it be the right thing for this to fail instead of sending
>>> the image unencrypted?
>>
>> The right thing would be for this to succeed. The acceptable thing
>> would be for this to fail. I'd prefer to do the right thing.
>
> You want to send the image unencrypted? I think some OTR users would  
> not
> want that.

I'm not clear what I said that gave the idea I wanted to send anything  
unencrypted. The binary data would of course be included in the  
payload that OTR would encrypt and decrypt.

-Evan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081217/09c3213c/attachment.sig>