GObject signals

[Gary Kramlich]

Stu Tomlinson wrote:

<snip>
> Except we'd be screwed if glib accepted a modified version of the patch
> with a different function signature. Not that I think that is likely,
> but it needs to be considered.
>   
Right, but we're not expecting a release out of the gobjectification 
branch for quite some time, so I don't really see that as a big show 
stopper.  I'm looking at this as more of a pre-emptive backport.
> Regards,
>
>
> Stu.
>   

--
Gary Kramlich