GObject signals

Gary Kramlich grim at reaperworld.com
Thu Jun 26 10:29:59 EDT 2008

Stu Tomlinson wrote:

> Except we'd be screwed if glib accepted a modified version of the patch
> with a different function signature. Not that I think that is likely,
> but it needs to be considered.
Right, but we're not expecting a release out of the gobjectification 
branch for quite some time, so I don't really see that as a big show 
stopper.  I'm looking at this as more of a pre-emptive backport.
> Regards,
> Stu.

Gary Kramlich

More information about the Devel mailing list