Fwd: Collecting feature requests

[Felipe Contreras]

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Casey Ho <pidgin at caseyho.com> wrote:
>>> We don't let patch writers commit their patches to our source code to
>>> our monotone server without discussion and review.  Again, most of our
>>> developers don't even undertake major changes without running it by as
>>> many people as possible for consensus.  I would really appreciate
>>> discussing things like this BEFORE implementation so we can have these
>>> discussions amongst both users and developers like we're doing now after
>>> the fact.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, please!
>
> I apologize if that's the impression.
>
> I say that because I've gotten feedback on a lot of things (primarily
> via IRC), and some things passed and others didn't.  Brainstorm was
> one of the things that did relatively well.
>
> Most things I've done have been looked at by other devs and have had
> feedback (not on devel).  Some were actually requested by devs.  Of
> course, the ultimate responsibility is mine, and if I've
> pissed/confused you, then you can tell me privately.
>
> If you have a reason to revert a change of mine, then do so.

The brainstorm was removed without any reason at all.

Did I miss something?

According to grim the reason is that some people expect the load to be
too high. Is that the reason? I can't find an explanation in this
thread.

-- 
Felipe Contreras