Carnegie Mellon Students looking for help
Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
imadil at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 00:32:46 EST 2009
* Etan Reisner had this to say on [23 Nov 2009, 23:58:16 -0500]:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:18:53PM -0500, Anthony Hugh wrote:
> > Thanks for all the quick responses. We worked on ticket #3329 and submitted
> > a patch.
> > Right now, we're trying to get a second bug fix in for the assignment.
> > We're working on ticket #9422 (Sort in "New Instant Message" and we're
> > having a little trouble finding the callback function on the "Name"
> > textbox. We see that it gets created via the "pidgin_dialogs_im" function
> > in gtkdialogs.c. We also saw that in gtkrequest.c:1109,
> > pidgin_request_fields fills in the call back functions for the ok button and
> > the cancel button. We can't seem to find where the "Name" textbox functions
> > are though. Could someone give us some insights on where to look?
> > Thanks,
> > Anthony Hugh
> The line from pidgin_dialogs_im that is the "magic" line here is
> purple_request_field_set_type_hint. If you look at
> gtkrequest.c:setup_entry_field you will see that it calls
> purple_request_field_get_type_hint (it is generally a fair bet that a
> _set_ function has a matching _get_ function) and that when the field hint
> has a prefix that matches "screenname" it does some stuff ending with a
> call to pidgin_setup_screenname_autocomplete_with_filter (which is in
> gtkutils.c). After a series of contortions that adds the necessary data to
> the gtk_list_store and sets the sort column on the tree store.
> Depending on what aspect of the request in #9422 you want to add you are
> going to need to do different things.
> Displaying the status would likely require a fair bit of work as I don't
> imagine (though I haven't checked) that the GtkEntryCompletion stuff
> supports showing complex completion results (beyond the matching text).
> Which means it would require a custom completion implementation (or
> similar solution to work).
#5936 discusses something similar. I don't seem to have the code for the
screenshot posted in there, but it demonstrates that it should be
possible, technically, to do some nifty stuff. However, I don't think we
would want the dialog to be too cluttered with too much information.
More information about the Devel