pidgin: be319950: Minor header file cleanup. Mostly I wan...

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

2010/2/5 Mark Doliner <mark at kingant.net>

> 2010/2/5 Jorge Villaseñor <salinasv at gmail.com>:
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM,  <markdoliner at pidgin.im> wrote:
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Revision: be31995039c1f8edae9ebedb54fc5fa3fa42e232
> >> Ancestor: b0098e2250f135d121960d8152e144e7e344125e
> >> Author: markdoliner at pidgin.im
> >> Date: 2010-02-05T22:49:11
> >> Branch: im.pidgin.pidgin
> >> URL:
> http://d.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/be31995039c1f8edae9ebedb54fc5fa3fa42e232
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> > <snip>
> >>
> >> ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> Minor header file cleanup.  Mostly I wanted to move some enums above
> some #includes
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I do like the msn refactor and cleanup but I guess it worth to cleanup
> > over msnp16 branch or merge msnp16 (it looks like working but needs
> > some testing) to i.p.p.  I just can feel the pain at propagation/merge
> > time with all this changes, specially the ones in user, notification
> > and status modules.
>
> Oh, sorry.  I didn't realize there WAS an msnp16 branch :-(  We should
> probably disapprove this revision and
> 527b068e9a1ccdec2baa09dfad37524062579f4c--they're not important and
> will cause merge problems.
>
>
I don't really think that's necessary. It just requires the correct choice
of merge heads.


> --Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at pidgin.im
> http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100206/c046551f/attachment-0001.html>