Time to Leave Monotone Behind?

[Zachary West]

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 18:03, John Bailey <rekkanoryo at rekkanoryo.org>wrote:

> One argument in favor of git, however, is that git supports the concept of
> the
> author of a revision and the committer of a revision being two different
> people.
>  Mercurial does not.  If I use 'hg commit -u "some random person"' then
> there's
> no hint that I'm the person who actually committed the revision.  I'm not
> sure I
> see this as a problem, but I imagine one or two people might object to
> this.
>
>
You could use a pushlog like so:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml

This records who pushes what, and I imagine something like it will
eventually get added to Mercurial proper.

Zachary West
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110116/0017bf9c/attachment.html>