pidgin.next.major: dbaa022b: We want libpurple.so.1, not libpurple.so...
Richard Laager
rlaager at wiktel.com
Wed Mar 16 03:31:42 EDT 2011
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 19:15 -0400, rekkanoryo at pidgin.im wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Revision: dbaa022b0a110063e55fdb3a46b07b011f3176e6
> Parent: f8a0990bfbc6d64f9afc8786d17d770824ef00b0
> Author: rekkanoryo at pidgin.im
> Date: 03/15/11 19:12:35
> Branch: im.pidgin.pidgin.next.major
> URL: http://d.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/dbaa022b0a110063e55fdb3a46b07b011f3176e6
>
> Changelog:
>
> We want libpurple.so.1, not libpurple.so.9.
Why do we "want" any particular soname?
Have you read this page:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110316/5c8fc9a7/attachment.sig>
More information about the Devel
mailing list