NetworkManager dependency

[Michael McConville]

Ethan Blanton wrote:
> Michael McConville spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > I think we all agree that the configuration should be explicit. It seems
> > like the discussion is just whether or not NM should be on by default.
> > What are your thoughts on that? I think it should probably be off by
> > default because it's only used for a minor supporting feature and it's
> > usually only available on one platform.
> 
> That platform is, of course, like 99.5% of our installed base for
> platforms that use autoconf.

True, I forgot about MinGW.