NetworkManager dependency

Michael McConville mmcco at
Mon Dec 28 12:28:03 EST 2015

Ethan Blanton wrote:
> Michael McConville spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > I think we all agree that the configuration should be explicit. It seems
> > like the discussion is just whether or not NM should be on by default.
> > What are your thoughts on that? I think it should probably be off by
> > default because it's only used for a minor supporting feature and it's
> > usually only available on one platform.
> That platform is, of course, like 99.5% of our installed base for
> platforms that use autoconf.

True, I forgot about MinGW.

More information about the Devel mailing list