[RFC PATCH] GStreamer 1.x support for Pidgin 2.x

[Jorge Villaseñor]

Could we use this "gstreamer 0.10 is dead" to force developers to actively
use main and get 3.0.0 done?

I mean,

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:10 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
wrote:

> GStreamer 0.10 is dead and no longer being maintained. Distributions
> really want to kill it and stop shipping it in their default
> installations. This adds the facility to build Pidgin 2.x against
> GStreamer 1.x instead, thus causing much rejoicing.
>

Could we use this "gstreamer 0.10 is dead" to force developers to actively
use main and get 3.0.0 done?

I mean, not merging this so we force ourself to just release.



> Obviously you can still build against 0.10. Even trunk retains that
> option, although I'm not entirely sure why.
>
> This basically resyncs the fs2 code with trunk, including one or two
> other improvements like the error handling. Largely based on work by
> Michael Cronenworth.
>
<snip>
>


-- 
Masca

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150319/05efd3b6/attachment.html>