Sorry, no intention to start any sort of jihad. Just providing the link since someone asked about it.<br><br>You know, though, I have to say I'm really sick of getting SHIT on every time I do anything to try and help. Obviously I'm not good enough, that's been made quite clear, and my clumsy attempts at getting involved are not only not appreciated, but down-right insulting to you superior beings.
<br><br>/me leaves<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Colin Barrett</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Step wrote:<br><br>> <a href="http://www.l33tskillz.org/writing/tagging-harmful/">http://www.l33tskillz.org/writing/tagging-harmful/</a><br>><br>> Subject line munging is explained well and advised against in this
<br>> article. I'll copy the summary in for the lazy, in spite of that<br>> being one of the points. ;)<br>><br>><br>> Some list administrators may not care much one way or the other about<br>> Subject header tagging, but simply haven't bothered to turn off the
<br>> feature on their lists. Other list administrators actively want to<br>> have their lists perform Subject header tagging, because they believe<br>> it provides a benefit for their subscribers. But it doesn't:
<br><br>We had this discussion once already, PLEASE can we not have it again?<br><br>Seriously, spare me another jihad. As I said before, I like the tags,<br>but if the list admin doesn't want them, I can add them back in myself
<br>no problem. It's not a big deal either way.<br><br>-Colin<br><br></blockquote></div><br>