I have mtn pull'd and up'd (I'm new to mtn, but that should do it right?), but there do not seem any differences. You are right about dbus, I am now just including dbus-maybe.h, and not compiling the rest. If the xmlnode struct init syntax has been fixed, then there are just a hand full of others that should take care of it (cleaned up patches attached). Do you think it would be a good idea to add a VS solution to the distribution?
<br><br>Nick<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/28/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Richard Laager</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I take it you were working with 2.0.0? Could you try with 2.0.1 or MTN?<br>I've fixed the xmlnode C99 struct initialization syntax, which was<br>apparently a problem for you?<br><br>With regard to DBus... Do you think it'd be better to simply avoid
<br>compiling those files at all, instead of #ifdefing out the contents?<br><br>Richard<br><br></blockquote></div><br>