Possible libpurple vulnerability in multiple prpls

[John Bailey]

Warren Togami wrote:
> Is this important enough to add to 2.5.9?  (It seems not, but asking
> before I build from the tarball.)
> 
> Warren

I assumed we would want this in 2.5.9, but I doubt it's critical.  That said, I
have not made any changes locally yet.  If we don't want to put this in 2.5.9, I
don't have to do anything.

John

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/packagers/attachments/20090815/f6a71e1a/attachment.pgp>