Proposed changes for Pidgin 2.7.0

Gary Kramlich grim at
Tue Jul 14 21:24:25 EDT 2009

Kevin Stange wrote:
> This is a lot of extra work if our developers have to maintain and test
> this branch for backports since none of us will be using it and the
> changed code may not apply cleanly.  How are you handling pidgin 1.5.1
> in RHEL 3?  Why not handle it the same way here?

As I've said before... buildbots are welcome...

> Kevin

Gary Kramlich <grim at>

More information about the Packagers mailing list