Content-Length bugs
Tomasz Wasilczyk
tomasz at wasilczyk.pl
Sat Dec 28 05:52:09 EST 2013
28 gru 2013 11:05 "Matt Jones" <matt at volvent.org> napisał(a):
>
> No problem, 3.0 sounds very important to help standardize a lot of
> this and clean up the overall flow of data.
>
> Do you guys need a hand reviewing any of this code? Also is there any
ETA?
Yes, a pair of eyes reviewing the new HTTP code would be really
appreciated. Just take a look at the libpurple/http.[ch] files in main
branch.
There is no ETA for the final 3.0.0 release.
Tomek
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mark Doliner <mark at kingant.net> wrote:
> > Hi Matt. Thanks for reporting this to us. We'll try to spend some time
> > soon to evaluate these places and fix the ones that look problematic.
> >
> > We have started to standardize on a new PurpleHttpRequest API for
> > upcoming 3.0.0, but that's a bigger effort and will take longer.
> _______________________________________________
> security mailing list
> security at pidgin.im
> https://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/security
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/security/attachments/20131228/4a83aee6/attachment.html>
More information about the security
mailing list