[Pidgin] #10720: Date change not displayed in XMPP log files spanning multiple days
Pidgin
trac at pidgin.im
Sat Nov 14 15:20:28 EST 2009
#10720: Date change not displayed in XMPP log files spanning multiple days
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
Reporter: piggin | Owner: deryni
Type: defect | Status: pending
Milestone: | Component: libpurple
Version: 2.6.3 | Resolution:
Keywords: time stamp timestamp date chat window log file logfile |
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
Changes (by piggin):
* status: pending => new
Comment:
Replying to [comment:9 darkrain42]:
> Replying to [comment:8 piggin]:
> > Replying to [comment:7 darkrain42]:
> > > What other protocols does it ''not'' occur for? (and are you
comparing chats with IMs?)
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> You didn't actually answer the first question in amongst your rant.
I answered it by showing you a list of non-XMPP protocols. I didn't test
them, if this is what you wanted to know (it would be difficult, at least
because they are too many), that's why I couldn't tell you which other
protocols it did not occur for. Perhaps the only thing I could do was to
name only the very few ones I could *confirm* were not affected by this
bug (but I knew it would have been irrelevant).
I'm not sure I understand what you're calling a rant. If you're talking
about my explanation, it was NOT a rant. I just tried an analogy that may
admittedly have gone a bit insane because I tried to make it sound as
accurate and fair as I could. "Comparing apples to oranges" is indeed an
improper expression; it didn't serve my purpose too well.
>
> And, with all due respect, the second question was valid. I did not know
what assumptions you have or have not made about how logging works. In
fact, the logging is very unified, so comparing one to the other would be
(as a first order approximation) valid.
I didn't say your question was invalid, but that my comment would've been
invalid if I'd said "yes". Your question was valid and I answered "no".
Then I tried to show how a "yes" would've made my bug report (and
especially a particular comment in my previous message) invalid. I was
implying something like this: "a *potential* difference between chat and
IM logging managements would have been my first suspect, which would have
been the first for me to disambiguate away before invoking (and then
reinsisting on) any hypothetical interprotocol differences (especially
after you'd already explicitly rejected such a hypothesis), as I did in my
previous message, so I couldn't have confused them".
>
> While it does not directly replicate what you are attempting to
accomplish, the Message Timestamp Formats plugin will allow you to have
date information for every line of chats/IMs.
I don't know where to find that plugin. I have a "Timestamp" plugin, but
it's very different from what you're describing ("Display iChat-style
timestamps every N minutes"). Or is it some recent addition to the 30+
plugins pack?
--
Ticket URL: <http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/10720#comment:10>
Pidgin <http://pidgin.im>
Pidgin
More information about the Tracker
mailing list