[Cabal] Contract change

[Daniel Atallah]

On 11/8/06, Sean Egan <seanegan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Luke Schierer <lschiere at users.sf.net> wrote:
> > We will naturally still reject any submission he comes up with that is
> > blasphemous or obscene.  Why did he object to that clause?
>
> Because he doesn't know what's considered blasphemous, defamatory, or
> obscene. The paragraph actually reads "to the best of Designer's
> knowledge," though, and I've pointed this out to him. Our lawyers want
> to keep the paragraph. I don't really care so much, as I can't imagine
> it ever being relevent ;)

Are we not going to see anything until it is done?  It seems like this
wouldn't ever be an issue if we can see (and comment on) drafts.

-D