[Cabal] Contract change
daniel.atallah at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 17:55:16 EST 2006
On 11/8/06, Sean Egan <seanegan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Luke Schierer <lschiere at users.sf.net> wrote:
> > We will naturally still reject any submission he comes up with that is
> > blasphemous or obscene. Why did he object to that clause?
> Because he doesn't know what's considered blasphemous, defamatory, or
> obscene. The paragraph actually reads "to the best of Designer's
> knowledge," though, and I've pointed this out to him. Our lawyers want
> to keep the paragraph. I don't really care so much, as I can't imagine
> it ever being relevent ;)
Are we not going to see anything until it is done? It seems like this
wouldn't ever be an issue if we can see (and comment on) drafts.
More information about the Cabal