Is 'purple' secret, too?
evan.s at dreskin.net
Thu Mar 22 09:43:04 EDT 2007
So we're not supposed to make 'pidgin' public until the lawyers give
the OK. Is renaming libgaim to libpurple an issue, as well?
I'd like to commit HEAD to the adium Libgaim.framework repository.
It has fairly low visibility in terms of number of people who check
it out but is, of course, public. I can continue to avoid using
version control for Adium's libgaim (libpurple HEAD, used via the
compatibility headers, will be in Adium 1.0.2, coming out soon) but
if it's not a problem I'd rather return to the modern era :) Adium,
the much more visible repository, will continue to use the
compatibility header... which references only 'purple', not 'pidgin'.
'pidgin' *is* referenced in a couple comments in libpurple, however.
Anyone both clever and caring could conclude that 'gaim' has been
renamed to 'pidgin' based on the replacement.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cabal/attachments/20070322/1d22cf38/attachment.pgp
More information about the Cabal