Is 'purple' secret, too?

[Ethan Blanton]

Evan Schoenberg spake unto us the following wisdom:
> I'd like to commit HEAD to the adium Libgaim.framework repository.   
> It has fairly low visibility in terms of number of people who check  
> it out but is, of course, public.  I can continue to avoid using  
> version control for Adium's libgaim (libpurple HEAD, used via the  
> compatibility headers, will be in Adium 1.0.2, coming out soon) but  
> if it's not a problem I'd rather return to the modern era :) Adium,  
> the much more visible repository, will continue to use the  
> compatibility header... which references only 'purple', not 'pidgin'.

You haven't *released* anything which uses libpurple, have you?  If
so, you are in clear violations of the terms of the GPL, unless you
have made libpurple available.

Ethan

-- 
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
		-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cabal/attachments/20070322/79a70d9e/attachment.pgp