Revision 027f65b8a9c14b727e5e81ac3062dce6bfe6c5c0

Sean Egan seanegan at
Sat Mar 24 21:02:56 EDT 2007

On 3/24/07, markdoliner at <markdoliner at> wrote:
> |   I feel some some pickier compilers have problems with that.

Hehe, are we programming based on our feelings now? :)

Anyway, C defines the macro replacement string as optional, so it
would only be buggy preprocessors (not picky ones) that would have a
problem with it.

No big deal; I just don't want to see you go and add 1's to all our
header guards :)


More information about the Cabal mailing list