Fwd: Re: msn-pecan now has direct connection support (fast file transfers)
rekkanoryo at rekkanoryo.org
Sun Dec 30 21:01:40 EST 2007
Gary Kramlich wrote:
> John Bailey wrote:
>> What if we, after 2.4.0 is released, put a firm freeze on libpurple and say no
>> new API, features, etc. in the core until 3.0.0, and then get struct member
>> hiding done for 3.0.0? Would this aid in gobjectifying for 4.0.0 at all? I
>> realize this would delay the benefits of gobjects, but would it help the moving
>> target stuff at all?
>> If this would help, could we all agree to it?
> Yes, this we work very well. And we could also follow my current plan,
> of getting plugins moved to gobjects first for 3.0.0 in this case.
Then I propose that this is exactly what we do. Any objections?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Devel