Fw: Information needed - Community Choice Awards Finalists
elb at pidgin.im
Thu Jul 19 16:17:55 EDT 2007
Sean Egan spake unto us the following wisdom:
> I suppose "charity" has a certain legal definition that's probably
> different from my brain's definition of it. I'll ask Ross Turk from
> sf.net what kind of charity he means. It seems a bit...
> non-charitable... to give to an organization that essentially benefits
> us, which all of IMF, SFLC, EFF, and FSF do.
I agree with this sentiment. I suggest Habitat for Humanity, as I
have been impressed with both their effectiveness and apparent
efficiency in personal contact with the organization. I also believe
that their mission (helping people help themselves) is among the
noblest possible. They have worldwide influence in both developed and
developing countries, which seems appropriate for a software package
Not to turn this into a food fight, which I think is against the
spirit of the whole thing, but I would have serious reservations about
Ka-Hing's suggestion of UNICEF. UNICEF has been plagued with the same
kinds of corruption problems as the UN, with a record of embezzled
funds, an overhead of middling double-digit percentages, and
compromises in program efficacy due to local political pressures.
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils]. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Devel