Proposal for an extended callbacks field

[Ethan Blanton]

Andreas Monitzer spake unto us the following wisdom:
> >> This action prompts the user for the JID of the search service, which
> >> has the same issue as the gateway registration you're proposing: How
> >> the heck should the user know what to enter there?
> >> Right now you're prefilling the field with the search service of the
> >> local server, which is a nice pick, but not the only one possible by
> >> far.
> >
> > Same as above. Can you explain to me how making this class of things
> > members of the prpl_info struct will negate needing to allow people to
> > enter in JIDs that they may or may not have at hand?
> 
> Discovery browser.

Please answer the question.  How does *making it a prpl_info callback*
change the game?  "Discovery browser" is not an answer to that
question.

  Why is it colder near the pole than in the tropical zones?

  Indoor heating.

Ethan

-- 
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
		-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070726/6ad193c3/attachment.sig>