[PATCH] SILC prpl ported to SILC Toolkit 1.1
stu at nosnilmot.com
Sun Jun 3 12:19:12 EDT 2007
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 09:27 +0200, Pekka Riikonen wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Mark Doliner wrote:
> : I'm afraid that requiring a newer version makes more work for
> : distributions that package libpurple, because they'll either have to
> : upgrade silc or temporarily stop providing the silc prpl.
> There are quite a few changes in the Client Library API which would cause
> the code to be littered with #ifdef's if we want to preserve support for
> the Toolkit 1.0. I did not do this, but certainly it is not impossible to
Would it be preferable to maintain two prpls for SILC in libpurple, one
that uses Toolkit 1.0 and one that uses Toolkit 1.1 ?
One thing I noticed in the patch that I don't like is this:
/* If the channel is not on buddy list, automatically add it there. */
I don't think simply joining a channel should add it to the buddy list,
but I may be misreading the patch.
More information about the Devel