[PATCH] SILC prpl ported to SILC Toolkit 1.1

Richard Laager rlaager at wiktel.com
Sun Jun 3 12:47:58 EDT 2007

On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 12:19 -0400, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
> Would it be preferable to maintain two prpls for SILC in libpurple, one
> that uses Toolkit 1.0 and one that uses Toolkit 1.1 ?

I'd be okay with this if it's a temporary, transitional thing. I don't
think we should maintain it forever. Perhaps we keep it until 3.0.0?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070603/8f615e22/attachment.sig>

More information about the Devel mailing list