[PATCH] SILC prpl ported to SILC Toolkit 1.1

Richard Laager rlaager at wiktel.com
Sun Jun 3 16:20:11 EDT 2007

On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 14:59 -0500, Mark Doliner wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:47:58 -0500, Richard Laager wrote
> > On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 12:19 -0400, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
> > > Would it be preferable to maintain two prpls for SILC in libpurple, one
> > > that uses Toolkit 1.0 and one that uses Toolkit 1.1 ?
> > 
> > I'd be okay with this if it's a temporary, transitional thing. I 
> > don't think we should maintain it forever. Perhaps we keep it until 3.0.0?
> That sounds like a lot of work...

We'd just copy silc to silc10 or something, and modify the build stuff.
Then the patch would apply to silc, making it the one to depend on silc.
With a little branch magic, we could easily have a 3.0.0 branch with the
old silc stuff removed.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070603/86c964de/attachment.sig>

More information about the Devel mailing list