Revision 4aabd11d86454556c0ed6e7c67640fa2a2ea5d6b

[Stu Tomlinson]

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 21:23 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> Shouldn't we be doing the MAXPATHLEN stuff IFF we're on glib 2.4, since
> that's the only acceptable case for it? Since we're only using it in
> core.c, maybe we should move it there? I don't think we'll be calling
> readlink() in [m]any other places.

If you prefer. Honestly I think just adding the necessary #include to
fix whatever the original 'bug' was would have been a more than
acceptable solution, and avoided some dynamically allocated buffers.

Regards,


Stu.