Updating Trac to 0.11

Luke Schierer lschiere at pidgin.im
Sat Aug 9 08:31:20 EDT 2008

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:56:28PM -0400, Daniel Atallah wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Atallah <daniel.atallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Atallah <daniel.atallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2008/8/4 John Bailey <rekkanoryo at rekkanoryo.org>:
> >>>
> >>> Can we *please* hide the priority field on tickets?  I'm sick of the complaining
> >>> that bugs are marked as "minor" priority (the default, of course) when we don't
> >>> use or care about the field at all.
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>
> >> I'm pretty sure that if we get rid of all the available Priorities,
> >> the field wont appear at all.
> >
> > I removed the Priority field in the test instance.
> >
> > I also created and added a new plugin that allows the ticket reporter
> > to edit the ticket description and properties and close the ticket.
> > (http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/172)
> >
> In the absence of additional feedback, I'd like to plan the upgrade to 0.11.1.
> The whole process shouldn't take more than an hour or so (during which
> the trac instance will likely be up and down a number of times) and we
> can (relatively) easily move back to 0.10 if there are unprecedented
> issues.
> My current thought is to do this on Sunday afternoon.
> I'm planning to keep the test instance around for easy testing of any
> additional tweaks we may want to make.
> -D

Have you looked at the TracMetrix plugin at all? I did for a trac
instance at work, and it would give us some stats somewhat similar to
those we used to have with sourceforge.

But yes, an upgrade looks like a good plan.


More information about the Devel mailing list