Monotone analysis

[Luke Schierer]

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:23:09PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Luke Schierer <lschiere at pidgin.im> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 03:33:01AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Luke Schierer <lschiere at pidgin.im> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:04:03PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Luke Schierer <lschiere at pidgin.im> wrote:
> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:45:19PM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 23:17 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> >> >> > = Git recommendation =
> >> >> > did some digging around, and since I am quite nearly an invenerate
> >> >> > pack-rat, I found a working copy of a git repo I created back when we
> >> >> > were evaluating which dvcs to use.  The git repo from then is 649M, my
> >> >> > much much newer monotone database is only 244M.
> >> >> >
> >> >> I asked you before; did you run git-gc?
> >> >
> >> > I am sorry, I did not see that question.  I did not.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> > Either way, I am impressed with the results of git-gc, now that it is
> >> > available.  It takes my nearly 700mb repository and reduces it to 44mb.
> >> > Very impressive.
> >>
> >> No, the repository back then was much smaller, I think the result
> >> would be around 15MB, probably less.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Felipe Contreras
> >
> > Um, no, Those numbers *ARE* from a repository from back then.
> 
> Without packing.

and 44Mb with git-gc.

luke