UPnP in libpurple

[Richard Laager]

On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 00:51 -0400, Evan Schoenberg wrote:
> libnatpmp didn't exist in its current, mature form way back when.
>  It's definitely a superior implementation from what I've seen. I
> fully support replacing the nitty-gritty code in libpurple/natpmp.c
> with libnatpmp's innards.

If libnatpmp is a real library (which I hope it is), I would prefer we
use it as such. For backwards compatibility, if libnatpmp is not
detected by configure, we could keep our existing libpurple/nat-pmp.c
until 3.0.0.

Richard

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080629/be4738b4/attachment.sig>