pidgin.next.minor: f00a8560: Use up the last padding for PurplePlugin...
Felipe Contreras
felipe.contreras at gmail.com
Tue May 6 02:59:18 EDT 2008
2008/5/5 Gary Kramlich <grim at reaperworld.com>:
> Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> > This has been previously discussed:
> > http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/2007-July/001999.html (the thread
> > started at http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/2007-July/001983.html).
> >
> > As a sidenote, this also has existed in the .vv branch for a while (from
> > rev 6b6656ec).
> >
> > Sadrul
> >
>
> I'm not debating whether or not this is the best way to expand the
> structures without bumping the major. I am however asking if this is
> something we want to do.
>
> The fact that it's been in the vv branch for a while now seems like
> nothing more than a red herring to me. I mean vv is going to be a major
> bump. Theres no reason we can't add everything we need, and then add
> some obscene number of reserved slots.
>
> Also, the fact that we're even looking at this, to me, says that we
> don't want to follow the rules we all agreed to about our versioning. I
> mean, if we need to add another member and don't have room, is there any
> reason feature X is that important that we need to work around a our own
> rules, and that just seems silly to me.
Indeed, this seems to be breaking your own rules; if you need changes
on the structures, do a major version bump.
If you really plan to support different structures at the same time
you might want use a version field instead of the has_func function;
it's less messy and more efficient.
However, if you plan to use GObject then all this is unnecessary since
you can use interfaces for that.
Best regards.
--
Felipe Contreras
More information about the Devel
mailing list