GPL Violation

[John Bailey]

Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> Just curious how this is a GPL violation?
> It doesn't modify the pidgin binary does it?
> It is a plugin that uses pidgin right?

Read http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/2009-September/008906.html.

John

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090928/2ddd775e/attachment.sig>