Time to drop the qq plugin?
chris at growl.info
Thu Mar 24 21:22:33 EDT 2011
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Etan Reisner
<pidgin at unreliablesource.net>wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:35:44PM +1300, Eion Robb wrote:
> > As weight to the argument, there's an actively developed third party
> > prpl providing a newer version of QQ.
> > https://code.google.com/p/libqq-pidgin/
> We gave the openq people access to mtn (ipp.openq) when they stepped up to
> maintain the current prpl (though they have clearly stopped contributing
> to us, I'm assuming openq itself is also fairly dead).
> Do we want to consider doing that with the libqq-pidgin authors? Give them
> access and swap their prpl in for our current one? (Assuming we can make
> that work without too much hassle for people ith accounts on either end of
> that change that is and assuming they even want to do that.)
Does that plugin work?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Devel