Time to drop the qq plugin?

Christopher Forsythe chris at growl.info
Tue May 10 12:39:12 EDT 2011

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> On 2011年03月25日 09:13, Etan Reisner wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:35:44PM +1300, Eion Robb wrote:
> >> As weight to the argument, there's an actively developed third party
> >> prpl providing a newer version of QQ.
> >> https://code.google.com/p/libqq-pidgin/
> >
> > We gave the openq people access to mtn (ipp.openq) when they stepped up
> to
> > maintain the current prpl (though they have clearly stopped contributing
> > to us, I'm assuming openq itself is also fairly dead).
> >
> > Do we want to consider doing that with the libqq-pidgin authors? Give
> them
> I AM one of the  libqq-pidgin maintainers.
> Actually I was thinking about inform you guys about migrating the
> libqq-pidgin when it get ready.
> And , yeah, it works now. But due to *not upstream* so it does no exist.
> Few people have tried. We need more test. And brings it to the upstream
> seems to be the right choice.
I'd think it would be better to just direct those who want qq to this prpl
rather than ship this one since it's so new.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110510/fc4b0858/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Devel mailing list