Time to drop the qq plugin?

microcai microcai at fedoraproject.org
Wed May 11 02:02:13 EDT 2011

于 2011年05月11日 01:36, microcai 写道:
> 于 2011年05月11日 01:06, Christopher Forsythe 写道:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:52 AM, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org>wrote:
>>> 于 2011年05月11日 00:39, Christopher Forsythe 写道:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 2011年03月25日 09:13, Etan Reisner wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:35:44PM +1300, Eion Robb wrote:
>>>>>>> As weight to the argument, there's an actively developed third party
>>>>>>> prpl providing a newer version of QQ.
>>>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/libqq-pidgin/
>>>>>> We gave the openq people access to mtn (ipp.openq) when they stepped up
>>>>> to
>>>>>> maintain the current prpl (though they have clearly stopped
>>> contributing
>>>>>> to us, I'm assuming openq itself is also fairly dead).
>>>>>> Do we want to consider doing that with the libqq-pidgin authors? Give
>>>>> them
>>>>> I AM one of the  libqq-pidgin maintainers.
>>>>> Actually I was thinking about inform you guys about migrating the
>>>>> libqq-pidgin when it get ready.
>>>>> And , yeah, it works now. But due to *not upstream* so it does no exist.
>>>>> Few people have tried. We need more test. And brings it to the upstream
>>>>> seems to be the right choice.
>>>> I'd think it would be better to just direct those who want qq to this
>>> prpl
>>>> rather than ship this one since it's so new.
>>>> Chris
>>> People who need it will use it no matter how *new* it is.
>>> People who don't need it will not use it no matter how stable it is.
>>> And by including it, we help the people who really need but unable to
>>> get it by himself.
>>> So, hey, please merge it back, don't erase it.
>> Sure, people who need it will need it, that's assumed. The problem becomes
>> that if Pidgin ships this prpl, or libpurple does, then it becomes a matter
>> of supporting it on the pidgin side.
>> I'd suggest a url inside the account window that points to the new prpl
>> until it is deemed ready to go, if ever, or something along those lines. I
>> don't agree with just adding some random prpl just because "people will need
>> it". That's an egregious lack of restraint that shouldn't be the policy of
>> any application with a user base even 1/8th the size of pidgin, finch and
>> libpurple.
> I basically agree with the idea.
> libqq-pidgin is not yet ready for production quality, but removing the
> support for QQ will sounds like very said to me.
> Give a link, let people know it and try it.
> V.E.O, what's your idea?

I've talked to V.E.O, he think the code is ready for pidgin.
And he  said he thought there was some bug in pidgin's network code,
some packets just lost, just lost.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110511/7e87a14a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Devel mailing list