Time to drop the qq plugin?

[microcai]

于 2011年05月11日 01:36, microcai 写道:
> 于 2011年05月11日 01:06, Christopher Forsythe 写道:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:52 AM, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org>wrote:
>>
>>> 于 2011年05月11日 00:39, Christopher Forsythe 写道:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2011年03月25日 09:13, Etan Reisner wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:35:44PM +1300, Eion Robb wrote:
>>>>>>> As weight to the argument, there's an actively developed third party
>>>>>>> prpl providing a newer version of QQ.
>>>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/libqq-pidgin/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We gave the openq people access to mtn (ipp.openq) when they stepped up
>>>>> to
>>>>>> maintain the current prpl (though they have clearly stopped
>>> contributing
>>>>>> to us, I'm assuming openq itself is also fairly dead).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we want to consider doing that with the libqq-pidgin authors? Give
>>>>> them
>>>>>
>>>>> I AM one of the  libqq-pidgin maintainers.
>>>>> Actually I was thinking about inform you guys about migrating the
>>>>> libqq-pidgin when it get ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> And , yeah, it works now. But due to *not upstream* so it does no exist.
>>>>> Few people have tried. We need more test. And brings it to the upstream
>>>>> seems to be the right choice.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'd think it would be better to just direct those who want qq to this
>>> prpl
>>>> rather than ship this one since it's so new.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>
>>> People who need it will use it no matter how *new* it is.
>>> People who don't need it will not use it no matter how stable it is.
>>>
>>> And by including it, we help the people who really need but unable to
>>> get it by himself.
>>>
>>> So, hey, please merge it back, don't erase it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Sure, people who need it will need it, that's assumed. The problem becomes
>> that if Pidgin ships this prpl, or libpurple does, then it becomes a matter
>> of supporting it on the pidgin side.
>>
>> I'd suggest a url inside the account window that points to the new prpl
>> until it is deemed ready to go, if ever, or something along those lines. I
>> don't agree with just adding some random prpl just because "people will need
>> it". That's an egregious lack of restraint that shouldn't be the policy of
>> any application with a user base even 1/8th the size of pidgin, finch and
>> libpurple.
>>
> 
> 
> I basically agree with the idea.
> libqq-pidgin is not yet ready for production quality, but removing the
> support for QQ will sounds like very said to me.
> 
> Give a link, let people know it and try it.
> 
> V.E.O, what's your idea?
> 
> 


I've talked to V.E.O, he think the code is ready for pidgin.
And he  said he thought there was some bug in pidgin's network code,
some packets just lost, just lost.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110511/7e87a14a/attachment.sig>