Agreement with ICQ
Evan Schoenberg, M.D.
evan at adium.im
Sat May 21 10:13:30 EDT 2011
On May 21, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Ivan Komarov wrote:
>> Agreed. I don't think _any_ of these limitations can be imposed on
> Good point. I expressed our concerns to them (for the record, by
> "them" I mean Andrey Krylov, ICQ Marketing Manager in Russia:
> http://ru.linkedin.com/pub/andrey-krylov/31/937/2b8). They agree these
> limitations are impossible to impose on an open-source product, but
> this is the standard agreement which can't be changed. On the other
> hand, Andrey said the agreement is a pure formality and they don't
> really care about whether we satisfy these provisions or not. He
> confirmed we don't have to change *any* code in libpurple/Pidgin, all
> we have to do is sign the agreement.
That's not how contact work. You don't sign an agreement, the provisions of which are unacceptable, based on a verbal agreement that the "contact is just a formality; it's okay if you violate it."
Under no circumstance should this agreement be signed. If they don't care about whether we satisfy these provisions or not, they should provide us with a new contract themselves, or we should mark out the unacceptable provisions, initial the changes, and send it back to them for review.
> I admit it sounds weird, but, as far as I understand, the worst that
> can happen after we sign it is that ICQ orders us to remove the ICQ
> support from libpurple (which they can do in any case). IANAL, though,
> and I think we really should talk to our lawyers (if we have any, that
> is :)) before we do anything.
> Иван Комаров (Ivan Komarov)
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at pidgin.im
More information about the Devel