[ANN] pidgin git import v5
ostinru at gmail.com
Thu May 24 16:40:47 EDT 2012
24.05.2012 00:57, Peter Lawler написал:
> On 24/05/12 06:35, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Richard Laager<rlaager at wiktel.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 14:28 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>>> Since you skipped the relevant part, I'm just going to state it for
>>>> the record: the Pidgin project does *not* plan to have a publicly
>>>> available analysis for the rationale to moving to mercurial like other
>>>> projects have.
>>> This has been discussed publicly on the mailing list.
>> Discussed yes, analyzed in detail and carefully list the pros and cons
>> of each option--no.
> IAJACPW, but from my reading of the threads in January it seemed to me
> that a bunch of points were gone through, a decision was taken to go
> with .hg.
> You, and only you, seem unhappy with the decision taken and then called
> for an in depth analysis. I don't think that it'd be unreasonable to
> conclude that this is because you're unhappy with the decision and you
> want the decision to go to hg to be changed. I would ask you, if you -
> or anyone else - were to produce such an analysis and hg was still
> chosen, what would you request then?
> On this point, I note that it's been around 5 months since you mentioned
> wanting to see an analysis. No one else on the list seems to have cared
> for one, with or without as much passion as you have. I encourage you to
> produce one ASAP.
I am unhappy too:
5 month have passed, but sources didn't moved to hg/git/svn!
I do not want to argue about hg vs git... but please migrate!
Monotone does easy things not trivial.
Users/developers shouldn't think about database, monotone version,
path's... etc. Just "XXX clone URL" and work with code!
// sory for my english
More information about the Devel