Contact avatars, Summer Of Code & Stuff
mark at kingant.net
Mon Apr 22 02:57:00 EDT 2013
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tobia Tesan <tobia.tesan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. While we are at it, I noticed that the "Get Info" window from the contact
> list could as well benefit from the treatment, showing the same info I get
> in Google Contacts.
> I am not sure if there is anything else that can be reasonably done.
> I think editing and reorganizing contacts is a bit outside our scope, it's
> more of an Address Book application thing, do you agree?
I agree. I guess I should add that I'm personally not super excited
about a plugin that shows Google Contact information in various
places. I'm a minimalist, and the added UI complexity of seeing that
extra information does not justify the benefit for me. But that's
> 2. I noticed that under libpurple/protocols/jabber there is already some
> Google-specific code (GTalk, A/V and stuff).
> Does this matter? Should I leave it alone?
Yeah it's fine. We're ok with Google-specific XMPP code living in the
XMPP PRPL directly. I think code that interfaces with a non-XMPP API
should not live there.
> Among other things, I'd probably have to authenticate with the Google APIs
> using the same credentials as Google Talk: if I had a separate plugin would
> I have to have the user re-entering the same credentials twice or is there
> any way I can snatch them from the jabber plugin (i suspect not)?
Plugins have access to usernames and passwords.
> Would it make sense to draft a proposal to do this along with, say, adding
> support for some XEPs and fixing some XMPP bugs?
> In the Ideas page, what do you guys exactly refer to when you ask for
> "better Gmail support"?
> Is there a thread somewhere on the ML I can read to catch up?
> Couldn't find it.
I don't know. My guess is that "better Gmail support" should be
changed to "better support for Google hosted XMPP" or something. I
don't who added that to the ideas page or what they had in mind.
> § The Easy Plugins idea is starting to look promising and meaningful to me,
> as well.
> 1. Is there any existing mockup or something, interface-wise?
> I've been told by UX people that every time a programmer designs an
> interface, a fairy dies somewhere :)
Not that I know of.
> 2. Django allowed?
> do you have anything against receiving more than a proposal from a single
More information about the Devel