New potential DoS vulnerability

[John Bailey]

On 12/23/2010 01:40 PM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
>>   Assuming a CVE identifier needs to be assigned to this issue. Let us
>> know,
>> if it is still needed or one should be assigned. (just checking to avoid
>> duplicates).
> 
> The last sentence should have been: "Let us know if it is still needed
> or one has been already assigned. If the later is the case, please
> let us know the particular identifier."

Sorry, Jan, I forgot to mention that we don't have a CVE for it.  If you guys
can assign one, we'd greatly appreciate it!

Thanks,
John

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/private/packagers/attachments/20101223/d01f5238/attachment.pgp>